This document is a review of the possible breaches by wind energy projects of various of the human  rights  of people living in the vicinity of a  wind project. It  identifies and considers a number  of  potential  breaches  of  varying  impact  and  of  differing  ease  or  difficulty  of establishing. In this context the rights to health, safe working conditions and property may be the simplest to establish whether breaches have or have not occurred. 
download pdf file

A.  Summary
Industry spin and uncritical but determined admirers of wind energy have encouraged the political and public view of the wind industry as beyond criticism and critical analysis. In contrast people living in the vicinity of Wind Energy Projects (WEPs) have been suffering both mentally and physically since turbines have appeared in their previously quiet, peaceful and healthy environments.
Some high quality work by US scientists

in the 1980s uncovered a wind turbine sound profile (signature) that included infrasound and low frequency sound (ILFN). This signature was unlike that of any other source of sound. ILFN at very low and specific frequencies was identified as the cause of health problems in humans. The industry and their favoured acousticians “forgot” this work; but recent field work in Australia has confirmed the unique sound profile and the cause and effect. Advances in instrumentation are allowing more work to be undertaken in victims’ homes by privately funded acousticians independent of the wind industry.

Characteristically the victims have no funds to seek legal relief or advice but that may become easier as the findings are repeated. Meanwhile the victims continue to endure what they claim are intolerable bodily impacts with their personal sensitivity increasing with time iii. 

Whilst the industry currently feels secure against court action, it has occurred to some that the industry and government regulatory authorities are quite possibly causing major breaches of certain of the victims’ human rights; and that this is an avenue that should, and can, be diligently pursued with a minimum outlay of scarce funds. Matching of the proven impacts with defined and accepted human rights is the purpose of this document.

Matching shows that rights involving:
  Cruel, Inhuman and Degrading Treatment 
  Discrimination
  Arbitrary Interference
  Working Conditions
  Family
  Children 
  Physical and Mental Health 
  Homes and Other Assets

are seemingly being both ignored, and breached.It is not necessary that every one of the above identified rights is breached. One alleged breach against one person at one wind project is enough to trigger the obligations of the Human Rights Commission. 
Credit:  By Peter Jackson | Bayshore Broadcasting | May 2, 2016 | ~~

The first phase of a Huron County Health Unit study on the perceived adverse health effects of wind turbines is about to get under way.

Leading the study is Health Unit epidemiologist Doctor Erica Clark.

She tells The Beach News that the first phase launching this month will be dedicated to information gathering.

Doctor Clark says she will interview each participant personally, before any turbine-related information is received.

The questions asked will include the number of turbines located near where the participant lives, and what kind of structures are on their property.

Doctor Clark notes that each person taking part will then be given a personal code to use when answering questions in the on-line portion of the survey.

For those without Internet access, the survey is available in hard copy form.

She points out that further action in the second phase of the survey will depend on analysis of phase one questionnaires.

Phase two will involve actual measurements of things like ambient noise coming from the turbines.

Doctor Clarke says the Health Unit will share survey information with the provincial and federal governments.

She stresses that the Health Unit initiative is not related to the Health Canada survey of health issues connected to wind turbines that was done in 2013 and 2014.

Acoustical measure analysis is still being examined, and findings of the federal study have not been released yet.

Source:  By Peter Jackson | Bayshore Broadcasting | May 2, 2016 |